Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:55:07 +0000 | From | James Hogan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port |
| |
Hi Stephen, Al,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 +0000 James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> wrote: > > > > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch > > of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and > > GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal). > > OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to Al.
I'm still rebasing the metag tree, and it's not quite ready for -next so I don't mind if Al's tree rebases at this stage tbh.
Al: I don't know if you normally rebase your tree, but if it's okay with you I'll let you know when I need it not to be rebased.
> > git://github.com/jahogan/metag-linux.git > > branch: metag-core > > tag: metag-core-v3.1 > > When you think it is sufficiently ready (and I am guessing that it is > getting pretty close), please send me a request to add it to linux-next.
Thanks, will do.
Would "sufficiently ready" normally mean "in a state ready to send a pull request to Linus"?
Thanks James [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |