lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: kernel BUG at kernel/sched_rt.c:493!
From
Date
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 06:22 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 13:58 -0600, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
>
> > Here is the output:
> >
> > [ 81.278842] SysRq : Changing Loglevel
> > [ 81.279027] Loglevel set to 9
> > [ 83.285456] Initial want: 50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 900000000
> > [ 85.286452] Initial want: 50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 900000000
> > [ 85.289625] Initial want: 50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 900000000
> > [ 87.287435] Initial want: 100000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 850000000
> > [ 87.290718] Initial want: 50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 900000000
> > [ 89.288469] Initial want: -50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 1000000000
> > [ 89.291550] Initial want: 150000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 800000000
> > [ 89.292940] Initial want: 100000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 850000000
> > [ 89.294082] Initial want: 100000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 850000000
> > [ 89.295194] Initial want: 50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 900000000
> > [ 89.296274] Initial want: 50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 900000000
> > [ 90.959004] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
> > [ 91.289470] Initial want: 200000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 750000000
> > [ 91.292767] Initial want: 200000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 750000000
> > [ 91.294037] Initial want: 200000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 750000000
> > [ 91.295364] Initial want: 200000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 750000000
> > [ 91.296355] BUG triggered, want: 200000000
> > [ 91.296355]
> > [ 91.296355] rt_rq[7]:
> > [ 91.296355] .rt_nr_running : 0
> > [ 91.296355] .rt_throttled : 0
> > [ 91.296355] .rt_time : 0.000000
> > [ 91.296355] .rt_runtime : 750.000000
> > [ 91.307332] Initial want: -50000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 1000000000
> > [ 91.308440] Initial want: -100000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 1050000000
> > [ 91.309586] Initial want: -150000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 1100000000
> > [ 91.310716] Initial want: -200000000 rt_b->rt_runtime: 950000000 rt_rq->rt_runtime: 1150000000
> > [ 91.311707] BUG triggered, want: -200000000
> > [ 91.311707]
> > [ 91.311707] rt_rq[6]:
> > [ 91.311707] .rt_nr_running : 1
> > [ 91.311707] .rt_throttled : 0
> > [ 91.311707] .rt_time : 307.209987
> > [ 91.311707] .rt_runtime : 1150.000000
>
> That makes about as much sense as my crash did. There is no leak, but
> cpu found nada. So rd/span is changing on us?

So I looked at the locking (yet again), and (for the umpteenth time) see
no way in the world that can happen. Hrmph.

-Mike



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-11 07:41    [W:0.469 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site