lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] usb: dwc3: Remove dwc3 dependency on gadget.
From
Hi,


On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 07:13:55PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 07:28:33PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> >> DWC3 controller curretly depends on CONFIG_USB and CONFIG_USB_GADGET.
>> >> Some hardware may like to use only host feature on dwc3.
>> >> So, removing the dependency of USB_DWC3 on USB_GADGET
>> >> and further modulating the dwc3 core to enable gadget features
>> >> only with USB_GADGET.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>
>> >> CC: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> >
>> > right, right... Eventually we need to do it, but you're only making
>> > gadget side optional. Host side should be optional too, but then you
>> > need to make sure we don't build dwc3 without gadget and host.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, true we need to make host side also optional, build dwc3 only when
>> either of host or gadget are built.
>
> btw, make the default Dual-Role, if user/defconfig doesn't select
> anything we want to build with all features.
>

Yes we can try something like this ?

if (USB || USB_GADGET)
menuconfig USB_DWC3
tristate "DesignWare USB3 DRD Core Support"
...

if USB_DWC3
choice
default USB_DWC3_DUAL_ROLE_MODE
...

config USB_DWC3_HOST_MODE
...

config USB_DWC3_DEVICE_MODE
...

config USB_DWC3_DUAL_ROLE_MODE
...

endchoice

..
..
endif
endif


>> > Maybe make a mode selection for Host-only, Peripheral-only, Dual-Role
>> > Device ??
>> >
>>
>> True this will be good idea to use modes: host only, gadget only or dual role.
>> May be the platform glue layers can use them later to put the controller
>> in a specific mode ?
>
> probably not as that's likely to change from board to board.
>
>> >> int dwc3_gadget_init(struct dwc3 *dwc);
>> >> void dwc3_gadget_exit(struct dwc3 *dwc);
>> >> +#else
>> >> +static inline int dwc3_gadget_init(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>> >> +{ return -EINVAL; }
>> >> +static inline void dwc3_gadget_exit(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>> >> +{ }
>> >> +#endif
>> >>
>> >> #endif /* __DRIVERS_USB_DWC3_CORE_H */
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c
>> >> index d4a30f1..553bbaa 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/debugfs.c
>> >> @@ -535,7 +535,8 @@ static ssize_t dwc3_testmode_write(struct file *file,
>> >> testmode = 0;
>> >>
>> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags);
>> >> - dwc3_gadget_set_test_mode(dwc, testmode);
>> >> + if (dwc3_gadget_set_test_mode(dwc, testmode))
>> >> + dev_dbg(dwc->dev, "host: Invalid request\n");
>> >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>> >>
>> >> return count;
>> >
>> > wrong, if you don't have gadget mode, you just don't create this file.
>> >
>>
>> dwc3-core makes call to dwc3_debugfs_init() invariably depending on DEBUG_FS.
>> Will this not go ahead and create this file ?
>> I think i am missing here something. :-(
>
> right, you can change dwc3_debugfs_init() to take into account the fact
> that you're a gadget/drd or host-only.
>
> In case of host only, you stil want regdump to be available :-)
>

So in dwc3_debugfs_init() we shall actually create just 'regdump' file
in case of host only mode, otherwise keep the dwc3_debugfs_init() happy
with creating other files too.
Right ?



--
Thanks & Regards
Vivek

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-11 16:01    [W:0.042 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site