[lkml]   [2013]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/44] Meta Linux Kernel Port
Hi Stephen,

On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 +0000 James Hogan <> wrote:
>> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
>>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
>>> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge with
>>> linux-next ...
>> Thanks for the info Stephen. So I suppose if the patchset depended on
>> things in -next the normal way to do it would be to merge in the
>> individual trees I needed first?
> Yep, but please let the maintainers of those trees know that you expect
> their tree to not be rebased. Or, if if they aren't really dependencies
> just conflicts, then leave the other tree out and let me and Linus fix
> the conflicts when we merge your tree.

Okay, thanks. Due to the recent merge window the dependencies are
trivial at the moment, and it wouldn't introduce build breakage to
exclude them (i.e. it's just removing selects from Kconfig files and
defconfigs that have been removed in linux-next), so I'll exclude those
changes for now and deal with them later.


[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-01-11 15:21    [W:0.167 / U:2.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site