lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/23] rcu: Simplify quiescent-state detection
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 11:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
>
> The current quiescent-state detection algorithm is needlessly
> complex.

Heh! Be careful, we might be led into believing all this RCU is actually
really rather simple and this complexity is a bug on your end ;-)

> It records the grace-period number corresponding to
> the quiescent state at the time of the quiescent state, which
> works, but it seems better to simply erase any record of previous
> quiescent states at the time that the CPU notices the new grace
> period. This has the further advantage of removing another piece
> of RCU for which lockless reasoning is required.

So why didn't you do that from the start? :-)

That is, I'm curious to know some history, why was it so and what led
you to this insight?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-06 17:42    [W:0.234 / U:5.876 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site