lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
Subject[PATCH] drbd: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail
From
From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>

Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
index 6bce2cc..a196281 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
@@ -141,8 +141,7 @@ static void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_epoch_entry *e) __releases(lo

spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->req_lock, flags);
mdev->writ_cnt += e->size >> 9;
- list_del(&e->w.list); /* has been on active_ee or sync_ee */
- list_add_tail(&e->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
+ list_move_tail(&e->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);

/* No hlist_del_init(&e->collision) here, we did not send the Ack yet,
* neither did we wake possibly waiting conflicting requests.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-05 09:42    [W:0.066 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site