Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Sep 2012 21:37:42 +0100 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/11] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter in a secure boot environment |
| |
> Gotta say this capability name is confusing. Naming is > CAP_PRE_SECURE_BOOT or something along the lines might be a better > choice. When I just look at this name, I sure thought this > CAP_SECURE_FIRMWARE true means it is a secure boot capable firmware.
Given there is nothing secure about it would it also be better to call it AUTHENTICATED_BOOT ?
Alan
| |