lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm-current tree
Hi Rob,

On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:44:16 -0500 Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right. The PCI i/o reserved area has a dummy physical address of 0 and
> needs to be skipped by ioremap searches. So we don't set
> VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING to prevent matches by ioremap. The vm_struct settings
> don't really matter when we do the real mapping of the i/o space.
>
> Here's my merge:

Thanks, I shall use this in tomorrow's tree.

> diff --cc arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 4c2d045,c2fa21d,512b2c0..18144e6
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@@@ -785,6 -785,6 -786,19 +786,19 @@@@ void __init iotable_init(struct map_des
> }
> }
>
> ++ void __init vm_reserve_area_early(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size,
> ++ void *caller)
> ++ {
> ++ struct vm_struct *vm;
> ++
> ++ vm = early_alloc_aligned(sizeof(*vm), __alignof__(*vm));
> ++ vm->addr = (void *)addr;
> ++ vm->size = size;
> - vm->flags = VM_IOREMAP | VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING;
> +++ vm->flags = VM_IOREMAP | VM_ARM_EMPTY_MAPPING;
> ++ vm->caller = caller;
> ++ vm_area_add_early(vm);
> ++ }
> ++

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-04 15:43    [W:0.058 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site