lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pda_power: remove ac_draw_failed goto and label
Hello Anton,

On 22/09/12 00:51, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:56:43AM +0100, Paul Parsons wrote:
>> A previous patch added the ac_draw_failed goto and label to
>> pda_power_probe(). The goto would be invoked after a failed call to
>> regulator_get().
>>
>> However the way ac_draw is used - always after a check for NULL -
>> suggests that a failed call to regulator_get() was not fatal.
>>
>> This patch removes the ac_draw_failed goto and label, partly reverting
>> the previous patch.
>>
>> This patch also removes the assignment of an error code to ret after a
>> failed call to regulator_get(), since the error code is now never used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/power/pda_power.c | 3 ---
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/pda_power.c b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
>> index d3be834d..7df7c5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/pda_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/pda_power.c
>> @@ -284,9 +284,7 @@ static int pda_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ac_draw = regulator_get(dev, "ac_draw");
>> if (IS_ERR(ac_draw)) {
>> dev_dbg(dev, "couldn't get ac_draw regulator\n");
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);
>> ac_draw = NULL;
>> - goto ac_draw_failed;
>
> For some reason you have a bit different code, so your patch is not based
> on the battery tree. (In my tree ret and ac_draw assignments are swapped.)
> Maybe that's because I had to manually redo your first patch...
>
> Anyway, I repeated your patch by hand again and thus applied it.

Yes, in my first patch I had swapped the ret and ac_draw assignments
when I moved the regulator_get() call to before the update_charger()
call. This was because the original order of the assignments:

ac_draw = NULL;
ret = PTR_ERR(ac_draw);

is obviously incorrect; the ac_draw assignment overwrites the error
code that should be returned by PTR_ERR().

Anyway, thank you for sorting this out!

Regards,
Paul

> Thank you!
>
>> }
>>
>> update_status();
>> @@ -416,7 +414,6 @@ ac_supply_failed:
>> regulator_put(ac_draw);
>> ac_draw = NULL;
>> }
>> -ac_draw_failed:
>> if (pdata->exit)
>> pdata->exit(dev);
>> init_failed:
>> --
>> 1.7.8.6



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-22 03:41    [W:0.054 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site