Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:02:30 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/19] i2c-nomadik: Register sub-devices when passed via Device Tree |
| |
> > > First, I'd like to have this patch squashed with "i2c: nomadik: Add > > > Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver". I wanted to do this on > > > my own, but the patches do not apply to 3.6-rc5 (with or without > > > regulator removal patch from Linus)? > > > > I'm really not keen on squashing all my patches together. They are > > clearly have very different purposes. If you think they are closely > > related, then pull them in sequentially, but please don't squash > > all my work into a single patch for no other reason than convenience. > > I can't follow this reasoning. I never asked you to squash all patches, > only those two needed to get proper device tree support. Why would you > want to let the device being detected via DT and not scan the child > nodes immediately?
Ah, sorry. That's my fault for rushing though my ridiculously bloated post- vacation inbox. I *stupidly* thought you wanted me to squash two different patches, rather than these two. As such I unreservedly retract my previous statement. Yes, please squash.
> > > I can also take the I2C related changes to the devicetrees via my tree. > > > This is not uncommon. Some people prefer to do this via their soc-trees, > > > though. I don't care much since this is not really a hard dependency > > > causing build failures or merge conflicts, but just needs a little extra > > > time until the patches are all there... > > > > It would be better for all the Device Tree changes go in as a single > > patch-set. Again, I don't care where they go, so long as they go in > > together. arm-soc seems like the most generic place for them to be > > pulled into though. > > This reasoning I can follow, but how should I know you aimed for that? I > only saw a patch [3/3] in one series making the driver probable via DT > and a patch [12/19] in another series to scan the child nodes. That's > all the infos I got. Some more context would have been helpful. Is there > a branch somewhere with all the things collected?
There will be. I'm currently just Ack collecting.
In fact wait ...
<3 mins pass>
Now there is: git://git.linaro.org/people/ljones/linux-3.0-ux500.git preview-for-next
-- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |