lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm/dts: omap: add dt data for MUSB
From
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 10:44 AM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>> Hi Benoit,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> wrote:
>>> On 09/11/2012 08:36 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> No major change from the previous version. Just removed the
>>>> omap-usb2 dt data and sent that as a separate patch.
>>>
>>> Well, I think you'd better keep them in the same series :-)
>>>
>>>> Rebased on
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git musb
>>>
>>> Since it is DTS stuf, you should rebase that on top of the latest
>>> lo/devel-dt branch. All the latest DTS patches an in there for 3.7.
>>
>> The ocp2scp data is not in linux-omap :-( And omap-usb2 has to be a
>> child of ocp2scp. So I used arm-soc tree to which ocp2scp stuff was
>> pulled into.
>
> Mmm, but from what tree? It did not go through Tony?
> What arm-soc branch exactly?

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git for-next
(or) ocp2scp

Thanks
Kishon
>
> In that case we need to merge Tony's devel-dt into arm-soc to have a
> common base or ask Tony to rebase on top of arm-soc.
>
> I added a bunch of change inside OMAP4.dtsi, so we can expect some nice
> conflicts.
> That's why it is better to push DTS patches using a single channel.
>
>
> Tony,
> What will make more sense to avoid merge conflict later?
>
>
> Regards,
> Benoit
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-09-11 12:01    [W:0.056 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site