lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/22] ARM: add mechanism for late code patching
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:19:10AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> With a flush_cache_all(), we could avoid having to operate a cacheline
> at a time, but that clobbers way more than necessary.

You can't do that, because flush_cache_all() on some CPUs requires the
proper MMU mappings to be in place, and you can't get those mappings
in place because you don't have the V:P offsets fixed up in the kernel.
Welcome to the chicken and egg problem.

> Sure, flushing caches is expensive. But then, so is running the
> patching code with caches disabled. I guess memory access latencies
> drive the performance trade off here.

There we disagree on a few orders of magnitude. There are relatively
few places that need updating. According to the kernel I have here:

text data bss dec hex filename
7644346 454320 212984 8311650 7ed362 vmlinux

Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
1 .text 004cd170 c00081c0 c00081c0 000081c0 2**5
16 .init.pv_table 00000300 c0753a24 c0753a24 00753a24 2**0

That's about 7MB of text, and only 192 points in that code which need
patching. Even if we did this with caches on, that's still 192 places,
and only 192 places we'd need to flush a cache line.

Alternatively, with your approach and 7MB of text, you need to flush
238885 cache lines to cover the entire kernel.

It would be far _cheaper_ with your approach to flush the individual
cache lines as you go.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-06 16:21    [W:0.084 / U:7.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site