Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "Paul E. McKenney" <> | Subject | [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Move TINY_PREEMPT_RCU away from raw_local_irq_save() | Date | Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:56:26 -0700 |
| |
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
The use of raw_local_irq_save() is unnecessary, given that local_irq_save() really does disable interrupts. Also, it appears to interfere with lockdep. Therefore, this commit moves to local_irq_save().
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> --- kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 10 +++++----- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h index 918fd1e..3d01902 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(void) rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.exp_tasks == NULL) return 0; /* Nothing to boost. */ - raw_local_irq_save(flags); + local_irq_save(flags); /* * Recheck with irqs disabled: all tasks in need of boosting @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(void) */ if (rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boost_tasks == NULL && rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.exp_tasks == NULL) { - raw_local_irq_restore(flags); + local_irq_restore(flags); return 0; } @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(void) t = container_of(tb, struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry); rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&mtx, t); t->rcu_boost_mutex = &mtx; - raw_local_irq_restore(flags); + local_irq_restore(flags); rt_mutex_lock(&mtx); rt_mutex_unlock(&mtx); /* Keep lockdep happy. */ @@ -991,9 +991,9 @@ static void rcu_trace_sub_qlen(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp, int n) { unsigned long flags; - raw_local_irq_save(flags); + local_irq_save(flags); rcp->qlen -= n; - raw_local_irq_restore(flags); + local_irq_restore(flags); } /* -- 1.7.8
| |