Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:01:14 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support to broadcom 5222 PHY | From | Stany MARCEL <> |
| |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macqel.be> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL >> > <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com> wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@novasys-ingenierie.com> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25. >> >> >> >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head >> >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy >> >> >> >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +- >> >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 + >> >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > >> > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go >> > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there. >> > >> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, >> > >> > Geert >> > >> >> Hello Geert, >> >> Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ? > > Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that > patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead > of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log. > > AFAIK the phy interface is standardized. > > Philippe
I meant patch 3 depends on patch 2 (multi channel dma api)
| |