lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH, RFC] Remove fasync() BKL usage, take 3325
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:56:46 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 03:32:49PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 06:51:04AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > OK, replacing a lock_kernel() with a spin_lock(&global_lock) is pretty
> > > straightforwad. But it's really really sad. It basically leaves a great
> > > big FIXME in there. It'd be better to fix it.
> >
> >
> > Umm, we've been discussiong this in and out a guestimated million times.
> >
> > Let's go forward with Jon's patch which is on obvious improvement and
> > if it shows problems later on we can revisit it.
>
> The point was that we already have a better patch from Oleg.
>

Where is this patch??


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-24 00:01    [W:0.111 / U:2.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site