Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:43:59 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml) |
| |
On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> >>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: >>>> How about this then? >>>> >>>> David >>>> --- >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >>>> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >>>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT >>>> config X86_32 >>>> def_bool !64BIT >>>> select HAVE_AOUT >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL >>>> >>>> config X86_64 >>>> def_bool 64BIT >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA >>>> >>>> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM >>>> def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT >>> >>> Looks sane. >>> >>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> >> >> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> > > Thanks, folded into David's original patch.
When will this be fixed in linux-next?
linux-next of 20120821 still fails.
thanks, -- ~Randy
| |