lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add control statement test to SINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO
Hi Franz,

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:44:57 +0200 Schrober <franzschrober@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> On Thursday 02 August 2012 17:23:22 Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > index 913d6bd..ca05ba2 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > @@ -3016,7 +3016,8 @@ sub process {
> > >
> > > $herectx .= raw_line($linenr, $n) . "\n";
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (($stmts =~ tr/;/;/) == 1) {
> > > + if (($stmts =~ tr/;/;/) == 1 &&
> > > + $stmts !~ /^\s*(if|while|for|switch)\b/) {
> > >
> > > WARN("SINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO",
> > >
> > > "Single statement macros should not use a do {} while
> (0)
> > > loop\n" . "$herectx");>
> > > }
> >
> > Looks reasonable enough.
> >
> > Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
>
> Works well for me, thanks
>
> Just as note: I think this test was accidently added twice. Once in commit
> b13edf7ff2dd0fef95e981170fa71fa6b60421b0 and one time in
> 7d64ef43914a734990e48a80bc60686c8db21946 (just checked linux-next, and Stephen
> added it again). Maybe Andrew Morton's tree is out of sync.

This can happen with Andrew's stuff since I rebase it onto linux-next
each day. The rebase is sometimes happy to apply already applied
patches. I will remove the second one today (unless Andrew beats me to
it).

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-03 01:01    [W:0.047 / U:1.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site