Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:11:56 +0300 | From | Antti Palosaari <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] driver-core: Shut up dev_dbg_reatelimited() without DEBUG |
| |
On 08/17/2012 09:04 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > dev_dbg_reatelimited() without DEBUG printed "217078 callbacks > suppressed". This shouldn't print anything without DEBUG. > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> > Reported-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi> > --- > include/linux/device.h | 6 +++++- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > index eb945e1..d4dc26e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/device.h > +++ b/include/linux/device.h > @@ -962,9 +962,13 @@ do { \ > dev_level_ratelimited(dev_notice, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > #define dev_info_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \ > dev_level_ratelimited(dev_info, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#if defined(DEBUG) > #define dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \ > dev_level_ratelimited(dev_dbg, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__) > - > +#else > +#define dev_dbg_ratelimited(dev, fmt, ...) \ > + no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) > +#endif > /* > * Stupid hackaround for existing uses of non-printk uses dev_info > * >
NACK. I don't think that's correct behavior. After that patch it kills all output of dev_dbg_ratelimited(). If I use dynamic debugs and order debugs, I expect to see debugs as earlier.
I did test module in order to demonstrate problem. Here it is: http://git.linuxtv.org/anttip/media_tree.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dev_dbg_ratelimited
There is also file named: test_results.txt It contains 4 test cases: 1) without that patch & without module dynamic debug 2) without that patch & module dynamic debug ordered 3) with that patch & without module dynamic debug 4) with that patch & module dynamic debug ordered
regards Antti
-- http://palosaari.fi/
| |