[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discussion]sched: a rough proposal to enable power saving in scheduler
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:01:25AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > *Power policy*:
> >
> > So how is power policy different? As Peter says,'pack more than spread
> > more'.
> this is ... a dubiously general statement.
> for good power, at least on Intel cpus, you want to spread. Parallelism is efficient.

Is this really true? In a two-socket system I'd have thought the benefit
of keeping socket 1 in package C3 outweighed the cost of keeping socket
0 awake for slightly longer.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-17 21:21    [W:0.144 / U:2.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site