Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:57:19 -0600 | From | Stephen Warren <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences |
| |
On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power >> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must >> admit this DT rule kinda sucks. > > Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is > there any reason we can't just change the rule? It'd be rather more > constructive...
I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters a lot...
| |