lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work
From
2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
>> 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> > Is this from an actual workload? ie. do you have a test case where
>> > this matters?
>>
>> No. it is not from an actual workload.
>> I got this idea suddenly, during implementing others.
>> I will do a test for this tomorrow.
>
> I don't think it's a bad idea and guess this wouldn't make much
> difference under most workload. Was mostly wondering whether this
> came from some crazy phone powersave optimization.

Okay.
It is not from an actual workload,
but I intent to optimize some crazy phone powersave :)

Thanks for comments.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-13 20:23    [W:0.181 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site