[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86, pci: Fix all early PCI scans to check the vendor ID first
On 08/09/2012 03:34 PM, Betty Dall wrote:
> I thought this should be a break instead of a continue since the code
> does a break if the class is 0xffffffff. If the function does not have a
> valid VENDOR_ID, then the remaining function numbers do not have to be
> scanned because functions are required to be implemented in order (no
> skipping a function number.)

Is that true? This is certainly not true in PCI in general: there is
required to be a function 0, but there is no guarantee that functions
1-7 don't have gaps.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-11 02:22    [W:0.091 / U:6.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site