lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_relize_xxx_limit can guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit
(2012/07/06 12:21), Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Could you merge all 'commentary fixes' into a patch ?


> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4b64fe0..a501660 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3418,7 +3418,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> /*
> * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
> * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> - * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> + * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
> */
> mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
> memswlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
> @@ -3479,7 +3479,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> /*
> * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
> * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> - * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> + * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
> */
> mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
> memlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
>





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-09 07:21    [W:0.048 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site