lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental
From
Date
Hi Randy,

Le vendredi 06 juillet 2012 à 10:23 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> On 07/06/2012 07:08 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> > This feature has been around for over 5 years now, so I presume it is
> > no longer considered experimental.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> > ---
> > Or is there any reason to still consider this an experimental feature?
>
>
> I doubt it, but if it is still experimental, it should also have
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL

Agreed.

> and then it would be nice if kconfig (the software) would add the
> " (EXPERIMENTAL)" tag when it sees such a dependency.

Oh yeah, I've been dreaming of this for years now but never found the
time to actually look into implementing it. Not sure if I would actually
be able to anyway, as it will probably require some Kconfig magic beyond
my knowledge.


--
Jean Delvare
Suse L3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-06 20:21    [W:0.320 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site