lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 3.4.0-rc1: No init found
On 07/06/2012 04:06 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>> Not sure if this is related, but at the end of each kernel compilation,
>>> the following messages are printed:
>>>
>>> ------------
>>> SYSMAP System.map
>>> SYSMAP .tmp_System.map
>>> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac
>>> INFO: Uncompressed kernel (size 0x6e52f8) overlaps the address of the
>>> wrapper(0x400000)
>>> INFO: Fixing the link_address of wrapper to (0x700000)
>>> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.coff
>>> INFO: Uncompressed kernel (size 0x6e52f8) overlaps the address of the
>>> wrapper(0x500000)
>>> INFO: Fixing the link_address of wrapper to (0x700000)
>>> WRAP arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.miboot
>>> INFO: Uncompressed kernel (size 0x6d4b80) overlaps the address of the
>>> wrapper(0x400000)
>>> INFO: Fixing the link_address of wrapper to (0x700000)
>>> Building modules, stage 2.
>>> MODPOST 24 modules
>>> ------------
>>>
>>> I started to see these messages in January (around Linux 3.2.0), but never
>>> investigated what it was since the produced kernels continued to boot just
>>> fine.
>>
>>
>> The above change was added by me. The message is printed when the 'wrapper'
>> script finds that decompressed kernel overlaps the 'bootstrap code' which
>> does the decompression. So it shifts the 'address' of the bootstrap code to
>> the next higher MB. As such it is harmless.
>
> I see this message every time when I build the kernel. I know it's
> harmless, but is this something that can be "fixed"? That is, can we
> change some linker script (or whatever) to make 0x700000 the default
> value?

You could do this by setting the link_address by checking your platform,
like some of the other platforms (e.g, pseries, ps3 ).

Or

we could add a parameter to the wrapper script to set the link_address ?

Ben, Josh,
What do you think ?

Or maybe modify the wrapper script to just automatically find
> the right spot without printing a message?

We need the message there for people who have restriction of a fixed
link address. This would help them to handle the situation accordingly
than blindly failing on boot.

Thanks
Suzuki



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-06 08:01    [W:0.086 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site