Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:07:01 +0800 | From | Fengguang Wu <> | Subject | Re: automated warning notifications |
| |
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:48:35AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:25:23PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > Hi Fengguang, > > > > > > I also check new static checker warnings and sometimes email people. > > > > That would be nice! > > > > > I wonder if we are duplicating each others work. For example, did > > > you send an email asking about the following Sparse warning: > > > > > > sound/soc/codecs/ab8500-codec.c:1959:53: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (1013 becomes 13) > > > > I did try sending out sparse warnings to people, some time ago... > > Apparently you have started up again? We're starting to trod on > each other's toes and people are getting annoyed with me because I > am reporting them after you... :/
Sorry for that! Yeah I restarted the sparse checks and have been sending out private emails after basic sanity check. Although there are 10000 existing sparse warnings, there are only very few *new* sparse warnings per day. This is pretty acceptable.
> Randy has suggested that we send these automated messages to > kernel-janitors. I don't know how the other people on kernel > janitors feel about this but I would be fine with it.
Randy also suggested kernel-janitors. So let's try it. I'll CC kernel-janitors for all of my error/warning reports and let's check how well it works.
Thanks, Fengguang
| |