lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] regulator: max8997: Properly handle gpio_request failure
From
Date
Convert to devm_gpio_request to save a few error handling code.

This patch properly handle the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY, we should
return error rather than ommit the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY.

I think one of the reason we got -EBUSY is because current code does not free
gpios in max8997_pmic_remove(). So it got -EBUSY when reload the module.

Yest another reason is in current code if gpio_request() returns -EBUSY,
the rest of the code still calls gpio_direction_output to config buck125_gpios
and set gpio value in max8997_set_gpio(). This looks wrong to me.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
---
drivers/regulator/max8997.c | 40 +++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
index 704cd49..e39a0c7 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
@@ -1025,7 +1025,6 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
if (pdata->buck1_gpiodvs || pdata->buck2_gpiodvs ||
pdata->buck5_gpiodvs) {
- bool gpio1set = false, gpio2set = false;

if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]) ||
!gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck125_gpios[1]) ||
@@ -1035,40 +1034,20 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_out;
}

- ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[0],
- "MAX8997 SET1");
- if (ret == -EBUSY)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
- " on SET1\n");
- else if (ret)
+ ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[0],
+ "MAX8997 SET1");
+ if (ret)
goto err_out;
- else
- gpio1set = true;
-
- ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[1],
- "MAX8997 SET2");
- if (ret == -EBUSY)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
- " on SET2\n");
- else if (ret) {
- if (gpio1set)
- gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]);
+
+ ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[1],
+ "MAX8997 SET2");
+ if (ret)
goto err_out;
- } else
- gpio2set = true;

- ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[2],
+ ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[2],
"MAX8997 SET3");
- if (ret == -EBUSY)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
- " on SET3\n");
- else if (ret) {
- if (gpio1set)
- gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]);
- if (gpio2set)
- gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[1]);
+ if (ret)
goto err_out;
- }

gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck125_gpios[0],
(max8997->buck125_gpioindex >> 2)
@@ -1079,7 +1058,6 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck125_gpios[2],
(max8997->buck125_gpioindex >> 0)
& 0x1); /* SET3 */
- ret = 0;
}

/* DVS-GPIO disabled */
--
1.7.9.5




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-05 17:41    [W:0.040 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site