[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
On 07/03/2012 06:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 03, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/03/2012 03:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:56:58 +0200 Daniel Lezcano <> wrote:
>>>>> So do you have a branch in the cpuidle-next.git tree that isn't going to
>>>>> be rebased?
>>>> No. I am following Linus tree and adding the patches on top of it.
>>> Please don't rebase your tree more than necessary - it just makes thing
>>> hard for anyone using your tree as a base for further development and
>>> throws away any testing you may have done.
>> Ok, let me sync with Len and Rafael about the best way to do that.
> Please create a branch in your tree for me to pull from and let me know
> which one it is. Please note that this branch must not be rebased after I've
> pulled from it and it's going to be included into my linux-next branch
> automatically.

Ok that sounds good.

Let me put in place the branch and rework my patches because they
conflict with the 'disable' flag moved to the per cpu structure.
In the meantime, I will send you the other patches which do not conflict.

> I'll include it into my v3.6 push, because I have a couple of cpuidle patches
> queued up already. We'll need to discuss the future of it after 3.6, though.

Ok, cool.

-- Daniel

<> │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <> Facebook |
<!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<> Blog

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-05 16:21    [W:0.047 / U:83.600 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site