lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ 39/40] cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:26:09AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 02:02:31AM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> > > Thanks, I've merged this with the "original" in the tree, so all should
> > > be good now.
> >
> > Thanks. I saw what seems another issue now on the patch too, sorry for
> > not noticing earlier: this backport is lacking the
> > write_seqcount_{begin,end} on set_mems_allowed for the case with
> > CONFIG_CPUSETS, like in the original patch:
> >
>
> Not my finest moment :(
>
> Thanks
>
> ---8<---
> cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3 fix
>
> Missing hunk from backport.
>
> Reported-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> index 8f15695..7a7e5fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ static inline bool put_mems_allowed(unsigned int seq)
> static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
> {
> task_lock(current);
> + write_seqcount_begin(&current->mems_allowed_seq);
> current->mems_allowed = nodemask;
> + write_seqcount_end(&current->mems_allowed_seq);
> task_unlock(current);
> }

Added to the patch, thanks.

I think with this change, and the others requested, I'll do a -rc2 just
so that people can test it all again.

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-30 18:21    [W:0.091 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site