lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/24] xen/arm: hypercalls
From
Date
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:21 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:02:18PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > +/******************************************************************************
> > > > > + * hypercall.h
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Linux-specific hypervisor handling.
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Citrix, 2012
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > > > > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> > > > > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; or, when distributed
> > > > > + * separately from the Linux kernel or incorporated into other
> > > > > + * software packages, subject to the following license:
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
> > > > > + * of this source file (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
>
> Erm, is that an additional restriction on the GPL which prevents me from
> shipping this code on a CD and charging for the act of creating the CD
> and shipping it? That would technically make the above statement
> incompatible with the GPL.

There's an "or" in there.

The non-GPL alternative license is the standard one applied by upstream
Xen to the interface headers:
http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/file/tip/xen/include/public/COPYING

It's the X11/MIT license IIRC, which the FSF say is GPL compatible.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#X11License

The same license is used a few other places in the kernel, e.g. the DRM
code.

Ian.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-27 17:21    [W:0.137 / U:3.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site