Messages in this thread | | | From | "Iyer, Sundar" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQ migration | Date | Mon, 2 Jul 2012 04:22:15 +0000 |
| |
Hi Thomas/Paul,
Any comments on the latest patch set?
Thanks
>-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Mundt [mailto:lethal@linux-sh.org] >Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 11:02 AM >To: Iyer, Sundar >Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; arjan@linux.intel.com; Monroy, >German >Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQ migration > >On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:25:07AM +0530, Sundar Iyer wrote: >> Chained interrupt handlers dont have an irqaction and hence are not >> handled during migrating interrupts when some cores go offline. >> >> Handle this by introducing a irq_is_chained() check which is based on >> the the CHAINED flag being set for such interrupts. fixup_irq() can >> then handle such interrupts and not skip them over. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Yang, Fei <fei.yang@intel.com> >> Tested-by: Ng, Cheon-woei <cheon-woei.ng@intel.com> > >Looks better to me.
| |