lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: rcu: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#3, trinity-child19/5970
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:36:53PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 07:22 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > OK, so it looks like the context-switch-time call into preemptible RCU
> > > needs to be outside of the runqueue-lock critical section. One way
> > > to do this is be reverting 616c310e (Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to
> > > switch_to() invocation). Sasha, could you please try this out?
> >
> > Hmmmm... Here is a patch for this reversion on top of -rcu with
> > conflicts resolved.
>
> It looks like how I've resolved it.

Good show!!!

> Just for clarity, the only rcu related patch I have on top of -next is
> this reversal one. I've dropped anything we tested before.
>
> Looks like its running fine for a bit now (~10 min). I'll ping if
> anything changes, but on the other tests it has usually failed at this
> point.

If testing goes well (both yours and mine), I will be submitting this
as urgent, since it is a 3.5 regression. If they don't take it, I will
queue it for 3.6.

Thanx, Paul



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-02 18:01    [W:0.074 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site