Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [ 166/187] raid5: delayed stripe fix | Date | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:35:22 -0700 |
| |
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
commit fab363b5ff502d1b39ddcfec04271f5858d9f26e upstream.
There isn't locking setting STRIPE_DELAYED and STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE bits, but the two bits have relationship. A delayed stripe can be moved to hold list only when preread active stripe count is below IO_THRESHOLD. If a stripe has both the bits set, such stripe will be in delayed list and preread count not 0, which will make such stripe never leave delayed list.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c @@ -196,12 +196,14 @@ static void __release_stripe(struct r5co BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sh->lru)); BUG_ON(atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes)==0); if (test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state)) { - if (test_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state)) + if (test_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state) && + !test_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->delayed_list); else if (test_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state) && sh->bm_seq - conf->seq_write > 0) list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->bitmap_list); else { + clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state); clear_bit(STRIPE_BIT_DELAY, &sh->state); list_add_tail(&sh->lru, &conf->handle_list); }
| |