Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:36:22 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] panel: Use pr_err(...) rather than printk(KERN_ERR ...) | From | Toshiaki Yamane <> |
| |
Ryan-san, Joe-san,
Thanks for your advice. I will try re-create the patch again.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 15:22 +1000, Ryan Mallon wrote: >> On 12/07/12 12:35, Toshiaki Yamane wrote: >> > This change is inspired by checkpatch. >> >> Your changelog needs to describe all of the changes you are making. The >> subject line only describes one. This patch is doing the following: >> >> - Converting printk(KERN_ERR to pr_err >> - Adding __func__ prefixes to printk lines >> - Refactoring split printk strings onto a single line >> >> There are a few other printks in this file which could be converted to >> pr_* to make the code more consistent. Perhaps a follow up patch? >> >> Typically for a sub-sequent version of a patch/series you should list >> the changes since the last round. Put these below the --- so that they >> don't become part of the change log, e.g.: >> >> Signed-off-by: Your name/email here >> --- >> >> Changes since v2: >> - Some stuff >> >> Changes since v1: >> - Some other stuff >> >> Some more comments below. > > And ideally cc the people that gave you notes/comments > on your previous patches too. >
--
Regards,
. . ...
Yamane Toshiaki
yamanetoshi@gmail.com
| |