| Date | Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:32:48 -0400 | From | Prarit Bhargava <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix for leapsecond caused hrtimer/futex issue (updated) |
| |
On 07/11/2012 07:17 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Over the weekend, Thomas got a chance to review the leap >> second fix in more detail and had a few additional changes he >> wanted to make to improve performance as well as style.
John,
FYI -- Using a mix of AMD and Intel systems (big and small, large memory and small memory footprint), current test runs are ~18 hours at this point without any issues seen, using a slightly modified version of your leap-a-day.c .
P.
|