lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: ab8500: Clean-up the last two ab8500 related DT match tables
Hi Lee,

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:28:35PM +0200, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 10/07/12 11:13, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> >Hi Lee,
> >
> >On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:43:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>A patch was recently submitted to stop all ab8500 devices from
> >>being registered through Device Tree. Instead, only the db8500
> >>will be DT:ed and the rest will continue to be registered via
> >>the MFD API, as they always were.
> >>
> >>Two patches have recently been applied which enable Device Tree
> >>probing; one for rtc-ab8500 and the other for ponkey-ab8500.
> >>These two need to be removed to prevent double-probing these
> >>devices with Device Tree is enabled.
> >>
> >>Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >>---
> >> drivers/input/misc/ab8500-ponkey.c | 8 --------
> >> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c | 6 ------
> >> 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
> >I don't know against which tree you generated those patches, but none of those
> >2 of_device_id arrays are in my for-next branch. So I can't apply this patch.
>
> I can rebase them on anything of your choosing.
>
> What is your for-next branch based on?
On Linus' tree. And the of_device_id arrays are not there.

Cheers,
Samuel.

--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-10 19:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans