lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH, RESEND] fs: push rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() to filesystems
On Sat,  9 Jun 2012 00:41:03 +0300
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> There's no reason to call rcu_barrier() on every deactivate_locked_super().
> We only need to make sure that all delayed rcu free inodes are flushed
> before we destroy related cache.
>
> Removing rcu_barrier() from deactivate_locked_super() affects some
> fas paths. E.g. on my machine exit_group() of a last process in IPC
> namespace takes 0.07538s. rcu_barrier() takes 0.05188s of that time.

What an unpleasant patch. Is final-process-exiting-ipc-namespace a
sufficiently high-frequency operation to justify the change?

I don't really understand what's going on here. Are you saying that
there is some filesystem against which we run deactivate_locked_super()
during exit_group(), and that this filesystem doesn't use rcu-freeing
of inodes? The description needs this level of detail, please.


The implementation would be less unpleasant if we could do the
rcu_barrier() in kmem_cache_destroy(). I can't see a way of doing that
without adding a dedicated slab flag, which would require editing all
the filesystems anyway.


(kmem_cache_destroy() already has an rcu_barrier(). Can we do away
with the private rcu games in the vfs and switch to
SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU?)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-09 00:41    [W:0.078 / U:1.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site