lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix usb skeleton driver
From
Date
Am Mittwoch, den 06.06.2012, 16:22 -0400 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Stefani Seibold wrote:
>
> > The reason to fix the skeleton driver was about the complains for my
> > NRPZ driver, which was based on the design of the usb skeleton driver.
> >
> > > Going even farther, I'm not so sure it's a good idea for usb-skeleton
> > > to try supporting both synchronous and asynchronous accesses. This
> > > adds a layer of complexity that people just don't need. IMO it would
> > > be better to have two separate example drivers, an easy one that is
> > > purely synchronous and a more advanced one that is purely async.
> > >
> >
> > Agree, i think this would be a good idea to have to separate drivers.
> > Both should be also working drivers, for really simple hardware.
> >
> > The best way for me to do this is to shrink later this to a simplified
> > driver.
>
> That makes sense. Will you do it?

Yes, if nobody other will do this.

>
> > I think it is important to have a clean and working example. It would
> > save a lot of time for everybody and shrinks the number of round trips.
>
> How can you tell that it works? By testing your NRPZ driver?
>

That is an option. But i will look for a more generic hardware. Maybe a
smartphone or a usb pen drive.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-07 11:01    [W:0.143 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site