lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v4 2/2] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support
From
Date
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:52 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 05, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 01:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, June 01, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 21:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, May 31, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 23:49 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 22, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Friday, May 18, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
[snip]
> > > > > Besides, this hunk of the $subject patch:
> > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -731,8 +791,8 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *
> > > > > > int error;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* bound the state we're entering */
> > > > > > - if (state > PCI_D3hot)
> > > > > > - state = PCI_D3hot;
> > > > > > + if (state > PCI_D3cold)
> > > > > > + state = PCI_D3cold;
> > > > > > else if (state < PCI_D0)
> > > > > > state = PCI_D0;
> > > > > > else if ((state == PCI_D1 || state == PCI_D2) && pci_no_d1d2(dev))
> > > > > > @@ -747,10 +807,15 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* This device is quirked not to be put into D3, so
> > > > > > don't put it in D3 */
> > > > > > - if (state == PCI_D3hot && (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3))
> > > > > > + if (state >= PCI_D3hot && (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3))
> > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state);
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * To put device in D3cold, we put device into D3hot in native
> > > > > > + * way, then put device into D3cold with platform ops
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > + error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state > PCI_D3hot ?
> > > > > > + PCI_D3hot : state);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if (!__pci_complete_power_transition(dev, state))
> > > > > > error = 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > should be merged separately, because it will affect suspend/hibernation code
> > > > > paths. Namely, it will change the behavior in such a way that some devices
> > > > > put into D3hot previously will be put into D3cold now during system suspend.
> > > >
> > > > Yes. This patch enables both runtime D3cold and D3cold during system
> > > > suspend. How about separate this patch into the following patches?
> > > >
> > > > - Add d3cold disable logic, including flags: no_d3cold, d3cold_allowed,
> > > > runtime_d3cold, and disable runtime d3cold (because part of runtime
> > > > d3cold support will be enabled by system d3cold support).
> > > >
> > > > - system d3cold support for PCIe port
> > > >
> > > > - system d3cold support in PCI core
> > > >
> > > > - runtime d3cold support for PCIe port
> > > >
> > > > - runtime d3cold support in PCI core
> > >
> > > Sounds good in principle.
> >
> > Thought it again.
> >
> > If my understanding were correct, in most cases, The value to put
> > devices into D3cold during system suspend/hibernate may be questionable.
> > Because after Linux put the devices into lower power state, the
> > firmware may put devices into D3cold state before entering system
> > suspend state.
> >
> > So, I think maybe we can just constrain the target state to D3hot in
> > pci_set_power_state() if system suspend/hibernate is ongoing
> > (dev->runtime_d3cold is not set). That is something as follow:
> >
> > /* D3cold during system suspend/hibernate is not supported yet */
> > if (dev->runtime_d3cold && state >= PCI_D3cold)
> > state = PCI_D3cold;
> > else if (state > PCI_D3hot)
> > state = PCI_D3hot;
> >
> > This way, we can just make some minor change to this patch and maybe
> > work on D3cold during system suspend/hibernate after some discussion.
>
> I don't honestly think we should add such ugly checks to pci_set_power_state().
>
> Why don't we ensure that acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() doesn't return 4
> (D3cold) if acpi_target_sleep_state is different from 0 instead?

We can add that into acpi_target_sleep_state. But pci_set_power_sate()
is public API and used by many places already, do a quick search in
recent kernel source.

$ grep 'pci_set_power_state' -r . | grep -v PCI_D3hot | grep -v PCI_D0 | grep -v pci_choose_state | wc -l

yields:
55

$ grep 'pci_set_power_state' -r . | grep -v PCI_D3hot | grep -v PCI_D0 | grep -v pci_choose_state | grep -i d3cold

yields:
./drivers/misc/cb710/core.c: pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3cold);
./arch/x86/pci/mrst.c: pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D3cold);

Although we can check/fix them one by one. We need to prevent future
pci_set_power_state to accept PCI_D3cold in some situation.

So I think we need to constrain the parameter of pci_set_power_state
anyway. Maybe something like below in pci_set_power_state is better
than my previous one.

/* D3cold during system suspend/hibernate is not supported yet */
if (!dev->runtime_d3cold && state > PCI_D3hot)
state = PCI_D3hot;

if (state > PCI_D3cold)
state = PCI_D3cold;

Best Regards,
Huang Ying




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-07 03:41    [W:0.519 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site