lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cycles encoding is architectural
From
Date
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 18:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> How about newer unknown Intel CPUs with arch_perfmon >= 3? Those would get
> intel_pmu, correct? There's no guarantee that they support the trick.

But they will have no PEBS constraints set, so effectively don't have
PEBS.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-06 19:41    [W:0.109 / U:1.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site