Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:37:34 +0800 | From | Jason Wang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: fix a race on 32bit arches |
| |
On 06/06/2012 04:45 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 10:35 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> From: Eric Dumazet<edumazet@google.com> >> >> commit 3fa2a1df909 (virtio-net: per cpu 64 bit stats (v2)) added a race >> on 32bit arches. >> >> We must use separate syncp for rx and tx path as they can be run at the >> same time on different cpus. Thus one sequence increment can be lost and >> readers spin forever. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<edumazet@google.com> >> Cc: Stephen Hemminger<shemminger@vyatta.com> >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@redhat.com> >> Cc: Jason Wang<jasowang@redhat.com> >> --- > Just to make clear : even using percpu stats/syncp, we have no guarantee > that write_seqcount_begin() is done with one instruction. [1] > > It is OK on x86 if "incl" instruction is generated by the compiler, but > on a RISC cpu, the "load memory,%reg ; inc %reg ; store %reg,memory" can > be interrupted. > > So if you are 100% sure all paths are safe against preemption/BH, then > this patch is not needed, but a big comment in the code would avoid > adding possible races in the future.
Thanks for explaing, current virtio-net is safe I think. But the patch is still needed as my patch would update the statistics in irq. > > [1] If done with one instruction, we still have a race, since a reader > might see an even sequence and conclude no writer is inside the critical > section. So read values could be wrong. > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |