[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/23] Crypto keys and module signing
    On Fri, 25 May 2012 16:42:19 +0100, David Howells <> wrote:
    > Hi Rusty,
    > If you prefer to have userspace extract the module signature and pass it in
    > uargs, here's a tree that will do that:

    OK, there's merit in this approach: it certainly moves the argument
    about how to encode the signature out of my backyard :)

    Should we just bite the bullet and create a new syscall:

    SYSCALL_DEFINE5(init_module2, void __user *, umod,
    unsigned long, len, const char __user *, uargs,
    unsigned int, siglen, const char __user *, sig)

    But I'm easily swayed if you prefer the current approach.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-06-04 07:41    [W:0.022 / U:1.604 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site