lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules
Date
On Friday, June 29, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 09:24 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> When the system is booted with some cpus offline, the idle
> >> driver is not initialized. When a cpu is set online, the
> >> acpi code call the intel idle init function. Unfortunately
> >> this code introduce a dependency between intel_idle and acpi.
> >>
> >> This patch is intended to remove this dependency by using the
> >> notifier of intel_idle. This patch has the benefit of
> >> encapsulating the intel_idle driver and remove some exported
> >> functions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> >
> > This one looks good to me too.
> >
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>
> Thanks for the review Rafael.
>
> > Len, are you going to take it?
>
> Rafael, Len,
>
> After the discussion [1], I put in place a tree at:
>
> ssh://git.linaro.org/srv/git.linaro.org/git/people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
> #cpuidle-next
>
> I proposed this tree to group the cpuidle modifications and prevent the
> last minutes conflict when Len will apply them.
>
> I also included the tree into linux-next for wider testing.

I can't speak for Len, but I'm not sure he'll like this.

Anyway, you seem to have the same material as Len in that tree, won't there
be any conflicts in linux-next?

Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-30 01:01    [W:0.507 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site