Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 13/40] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:57:04 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:46 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > > I am not convinced all architectures that have CONFIG_NUMA > need to be a requirement, since some of them (eg. Alpha) > seem to be lacking a maintainer nowadays.
Still, this NUMA balancing stuff is not a small tweak to load-balancing. Its a very significant change is how you schedule. Having such great differences over architectures isn't something I look forward to.
| |