Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:01:19 +0530 | From | Rajendra Nayak <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] clk: Add support for rate table based dividers |
| |
Hi Mike,
> After thinking about it a bit more I still think a separate > clk_register_divider_table is needed. Primarily this would reduce > needless churn in having to update all existing users of > clk_register_divider. I also think that clearly separating the two > functions will make it a bit easier on folks trying to port their clocks > trees over. > > Unless there is a technical reason why having two registration functions > is a bad idea, can you send a V4 with that new registration function? > I'll take it into clk-next. > Nope, no technical reason why it can't be done. I'll do what you suggested and post a v4 soon.
thanks, Rajendra
| |