Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:15:15 -0700 | Subject | Re: Early boot panic on machine with lots of memory | From | Yinghai Lu <> |
| |
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:22:14PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: >> > Hello, Yinghai. >> > >> > Sorry about the delay. I'm in bug storm somehow. :( >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:14:43PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> > I wish we had a single call - say, memblock_die(), or whatever - so >> >> > that there's a clear indication that memblock usage is done, but yeah >> >> > maybe another day. Will review the patch itself. BTW, can't you post >> >> > patches inline anymore? Attaching is better than corrupt but is still >> >> > a bit annoying for review. >> >> >> >> please check the three patches: >> > >> > Heh, reviewing is cumbersome this way but here are my comments. >> > >> > * "[PATCH] memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions later" >> > looks okay to me. >> >> Good, this one should go to 3.5, right? > > Yes, I think so. >
Andrew,
can you push attached to Linus ? or we need to route it through tip?
Thanks
Yinghai [unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream] | |