Messages in this thread | | | From | KY Srinivasan <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp | Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:11:55 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:40 PM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: apw@canonical.com; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; > virtualization@lists.osdl.org; ohering@suse.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:29:49AM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > > > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:26 AM > > > To: KY Srinivasan > > > Cc: apw@canonical.com; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; ohering@suse.com; > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:06:53PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > Are you still missing it; do you want me to resend the whole set? > > > > > > Nope, it showed up a few hours later, thanks. You really should get > > > that fixed... > > > > Greg, some additional testing with VM replication on Windows Server > > 2012 has revealed some issues with this patch-set. Please drop the > > patch set, I will fix the problem and resend it. > > Thanks for letting me know, now dropped. > > But, for the next round, I suggest you run this patchset by the netdev > developers, as I think you are doing things in an "odd" way for some of > the ip determination.
Will do. Just curious; can you be more explicit on what part appeared "odd" to you.
Regards,
K. Y
| |