Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:58:55 -0700 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Have printk() never buffer its data |
| |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:07:36PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 18:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> wrote: > > > > > > Buffering has nice effects though: > > > It makes continuation lines appear as one record in the buffer, not as > > > n individual prints with n headers. > > > > As I already mentioned, buffering for *logging* is different from > > buffering for *printing*. > > > > I think it might be a great idea to buffer for logging in order to > > generate one individual buffer record there. > > > > But it needs to be printed as it is generated. > > That's a good idea. > > Something like this could work - only minimally tested at this moment.
Hm, this doesn't boot for me, just hangs at startup :(
| |