lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/12] kmap_atomic cleanup for 3.6
From
Date
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 15:18 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Different arch has different values for KM_TYPE_NR, I am not sure if
> > unifying them to a fixed value could fit all?

No you can't. Some arch's have arch specific KM_TYPE thingies, like FRV.

> > For safety, I kept their original values.
>
> My fear is that it will make it harder to clean that code up for
> real, when there is no longer an indication about where the number
> comes from.

Agreed, I'd much prefer it if we'd come up with a sane way to compute
the max value before doing away with these enums.

Sadly I haven't been able to come up with a sane way short of whole
program analysis.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-25 20:21    [W:0.096 / U:1.392 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site