lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] kvm: Add missing KVM_IRQFD API documentation
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 04:15:50PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index 310fe50..9b4cb2b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -1965,6 +1965,23 @@ return the hash table order in the parameter. (If the guest is using
> the virtualized real-mode area (VRMA) facility, the kernel will
> re-create the VMRA HPTEs on the next KVM_RUN of any vcpu.)
>
> +4.76 KVM_IRQFD
> +
> +Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD
> +Architectures: x86
> +Type: vm ioctl
> +Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in)
> +Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
> +
> +Allows setting an eventfd to directly trigger a guest interrupt
> +kvm_irqfd.fd specifies the file descriptor to use as the eventfd and
> +kvm_irqfd.gsi specifies the irqchip pin toggled by this event. By
> +default this interface only supports edge triggered interrupts,
> +meaning the specified gsi is asserted and immediately de-asserted
> +when the eventfd is triggered.

That's a bit confusing. This assert/deassert only has effect for level.
Do we or do we not want to maintain this assert/deassert behaviour
for level irqfds? If yes we shouldn't say it's unsupported if
no we should not document it.

Gleb, Avi, any thoughts?

> Specifying KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN
> +removes the previously set irqfd matching both kvm_irqfd.fd and
> +kvm_irqfd.gsi.
> +
>
> 5. The kvm_run structure
> ------------------------


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-24 11:21    [W:0.127 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site